Evaluating the Integrity of Green Tax in the Presence of the Values of Thick Decision
Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange

Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange

Evaluating the Integrity of Green Tax in the Presence of the Values of Thick Decision

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of Accounting, Khorramshahr International Branch, Islamic Azad University, Khorramshahr, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Accounting, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Accounting, Abadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Abadan, Iran
Abstract
The perpus of this research is evaluating the Integrity of Green Tax in the Presence of the Values of Thick Decision. In this research, in order to identify the components (consequences of glass ceiling) and research propositions (hegemonic of power acceptance), a combined analysis was performed with the participation of 15 accounting experts at the university level and In the quantitative part, the components and propositions identified in the form of matrix questionnaires were evaluated by 22 CEO in Capital Market. The results showed that the statement of social responsibility in decision making (B2); Reducing conflict of interest in decision-making (B5) and legitimacy in decision-making (B6) are the most influential philosophical themes in crowdfunding decision-making at the capital market level, which reinforces the consequence of reducing environmental pollution as a component of green tax sustainability. This result suggests that crowdfunding decision-making, which describes the pursuit of a significant level of pluralistic social values, reinforces the implications of green taxes for the future, as companies increase their social responsibilities by expanding their social responsibilities to strengthen productive infrastructure. Reduce themselves and, through the disclosure of voluntary information in the form of financial statements, enrich social confidence and trust through insight into congestion decisions.
Keywords

اسلاملوئیان، کریم؛ استادزاد، علی‌حسین. (1394). مالیات سبز در بخش‌های انرژی و کالای نهایی در ایران: رویکرد نظریه بازی‌ها، پژوهشنامه اقتصاد انرژی ایران، 5(17): 1-37.
اقدس‌طینت، جواد؛ پورفرج، علیرضا؛ کریمی‌موغاری، زهرا. (1398). ماهیت ترکیبی تصمیم‎گیری: «بهینه‎سازی» و «تصمیم‎گیری نهادی»، دوفصلنامه جستارهای اقتصادی، 16(32): 121-147
امامی‌میبدی، علی؛ گلی، زینت؛ مرشدی، بهنام. (۱۳۹۷). تأثیر وضع مالیات سبز بر زیربخش صنعتی «تولید سایر محصولات کانی غیرفلزی»، فصلنامه پژوهش‌ها و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، ۲۶(۸۶): ۲۰۳-۲۳۴
ایزدخواستی، حجت؛ عرب مازار، علی اکبر؛ خوشنام‌وند، مژگان. (1396). تحلیل تأثیر مالیات سبز بر میزان انتشار آلاینده‌ها و شاخص سلامت در ایران: الگوی معادلات همزمان. اقتصاد و الگو سازی، 8(29): 89-117.
آهنگری، عبدالمجید؛ فرازمند، حسن؛ منتظر حجت، امیرحسین؛ هفت‌لنگ، رضا. (1397). اثرات مالیات سبز بر رشد اقتصادی و رفاه در ایران: رویکرد تعادل عمومی تصادفی پویا ( ). مجله علمی پژوهشی اقتصاد مقداری، 15(1): 27-61.
جواهری، حدیث؛ امیری، مجتبی؛ سیدجوادین، سیدرضا؛ فرهی، علی؛ امین، فرشته. (1399). ارائه‌ی الگوی تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی مدیران منابع انسانی؛ مورد مطالعه: سازمان‌های فعّال در صنعت دارو، مطالعات رفتار سازمانی، 9(3): 31-84.
حیدری، مهدی؛ یعقوب‌نژاد، یحیی؛ هلالی، ریحانه؛ عباسپور، مرتضی. (۱۳۹۴). ارائه مدلی جهت تعیین نرخ بهینه مالیات‌های زیست‌محیطی (با تاکید بر اثر تخصیص مجدد در صنعت برق ایران)، پژوهشنامه مالیات (نشریه علمی)، ۲۳(۲۶): ۱۸-۳۹.
درویش، حدیثه؛ بنی‌مهد، بهمن؛ نیکومرام، هاشم؛ رهنمای‌رودپشتی، فریدون. (1399). نظام راهبری و کثرت‌گرایی فرهنگی، حسابداری مدیریت، 13(45): 63-76.
ستوده‌نیاکرانی، سلمان؛ احمدی شادمهری، محمدطاهر؛ رزمی، سیدمحمدجواد. (1399). بررسی اثر مالیات سبز بر مصرف انرژی‌های فسیلی (بنزین، گاز طبیعی و نفت کار) در ایران با استفاده از الگوی تعادل عمومی محاسبه‌پذیر پویای بازگشتی ( )، پژوهشنامه اقتصاد کلان، 15(29): 73-97
ستوده‌نیاکرانی، سلمان؛ احمدی شادمهری، محمدطاهر؛ رزمی، سیدمحمدجواد. (1399). بررسی اثر مالیات سبز بر مصرف انرژی و رفاه اجتماعی در ایران با استفاده از الگوی تعادل عمومی محاسبه‌پذیر پویای بازگشتی ( )، فصلنامه علمی پژوهش‌های رشد و توسعه اقتصادی، 10(40): 34-15
سیدنژادفهیم؛ سیدرضا؛ اقدامی، اسماعیل. (۱۳۹۰). مالیات سبز در مسیر توسعه پایدار، ماهنامه بررسی مسائل و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، ۳/۴(۱۱): ۹۱-۱۰۰.
صادقی، سیدکمال؛ بهشتی، محمدباقر؛ رنج‌پور، رضا؛ ابراهیمی، سعید. (۱۳۹۷). تحلیل تجربی تأثیر مالیات‌های مستقیم بر توزیع درآمد در ایران: کاربرد مدل خودرگرسیون‌برداری عامل افزوده، پژوهشنامه مالیات (نشریه علمی)، ۲۶(۳۷): ۴۱-۷۲.
علایی‌نژاد، حمید؛ حاج‌حسینی، مرتضی. (1398). کثرت‌گرایی بیل و رستال؛ و وحدت‌گرایی حداقلی در مورد منطق، فلسفه و کلام اسلامی، 52(2): 289-309.
علی‌نژاد، شهناز؛ بنی‌مهد، بهمن؛ اوحدی، فریدون. (1394). اثر مدت تصدی مدیرعامل بر رشد ارزش افزوده شرکت، حسابداری مدیریت، 8(25): 1-11.
موسوی اعظم، سیدمصطفی. (۱۳۹۵). معناشناسی، هستی شناسی و خاستگاه کثرت تحلیلی در حکمت، نشریه پژوهش‌های هستی شناختی، ۹(۱): ۱۰۵-۱۲۵.
مهرانی، ساسان؛ ثقفی، علی؛ موسی‌خانی، محمد؛ سپاسی، سحر. (۱۳۹۰). عوامل مؤثر بر تصمیم‌گیری اخلاقی حسابداران رسمی ایران، اخلاق در علوم و فنّاوری، ۶(۳): ۶-۱۲
واعظ، سیدعلی؛ دارش، فرشته؛ بصیرت، مهدی؛ کعب عمیر، احمد. (۱۳۹۷). ارزیابی پایداری مالیاتی و ریسک مالیاتی آتی شرکت با تأکید بر نوع مالکیت، پژوهشنامه مالیات، ۲۶(۴۰): ۱۸۵-۲۰۴.
Aghdas tinat, Javad, Porfaraj, Alireza, Karimi-moghari, Zahra. (2018). The combined nature of decision-making: "optimization" and "institutional decision-making", two-quarterly journal of economic research, 16(32): 121-147. (In Persian).
Ahangari, Abdul Majid., Farazmand, Hassan, Montazer Hojat, Amir Hossein., Haftlang, Reza. (2017). the Effects of Green Tax on Economic Growth and Welfare in Iran: A Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) Approach. Scientific Research Journal of Quantitative Economics, 15(1): 27-61 .(In Persian).
Alainejad, Hamid, Haj Hosseini, Morteza. (2018). Bill and Restal's pluralism; and Minimal Unitarianism in Islamic Logic, Philosophy and Theology, 52(2): 289-309. (In Persian).
Alinejad, Shahnaz, Banimahd, Bahman, Ohadi, Fereydoun. (2014). The effect of CEO's tenure on the company's added value growth, Management Accounting, 8(25): 1-11. (In Persian).
Bauer, T., Kourouxous, T. & Krenn, P. (2018). Taxation and agency conflicts between firm owners and managers: a review, Business Research, 11(3): 33–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-017-0054-y.
Brush, E. (2020). Inconvenient truths: pluralism, pragmatism, and the need for civil disagreement, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 10(2):160–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00589-7.
Darvish, Hadis., Banimahd, Bahman., Nikumram, Hashem., Rahnamai Rudpashti, Fereydoun. (2019). Management system and cultural pluralism, management accounting, 13(45): 63-76 .(In Persian).
Daugbjerg, C., Svendsen, G, T. (2010). Designing green taxes in a political context: from optimal to feasible environmental regulation, Environmental Politics, 12(4): 76-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010412331308384.
De Miguel, C., Montero, M., Bajona, C. (2015). Intergenerational effects of a green tax reform for a more sustainable social security system, Energy Economics, 52(1): 117-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.08.025.
Dyreng, S., Hanlon, M., Maydew, E. (2014). Rolling the Dice: When does Tax Avoidance Result in Tax Uncertainty? Working paper, Duke University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and The University of North Carolina.
Dzwonkowska, D. (2018). Is Environmental Virtue Ethics Anthropocentric?, Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(2): 723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9751-6.
Emami Meybodi, Ali., Goli, Zenet., Morshidi, Behnam. (2018). The effect of imposing a green tax on the industrial subsector "Production of other non-metallic mineral products", Economic Research and Policy Quarterly, 26(86): 203-234.(In Persian).
Gerlick, J, A., Liozu, S, M. (2020). Ethical and legal considerations of artificial intelligence and algorithmic decision-making in personalized pricing, Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 19(1): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-019-00225-2.
Ghaith, A, F., Epplin, F, M. (2017). Consequences of a carbon tax on household electricity use and cost, carbon emissions, and economics of household solar and wind, Energy Economics, 67(2): 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.08.012.
Guitouni, A. (2020). Sustainable Value Management: Pluralistic, Multi-Criteria, and Long-Term Decision-Making, Responsible Research for Better Business, 149-182. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37810-3_8.
Halbesleben, J.R.B., Wheeler, A.R. and Buckley, M.R. (2007). Understanding pluralistic ignorance in organizations: application and theory, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(1): 65-83. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710721947.
Heydari, Mehdi, Yaqubnejad, Yahya, Helali, Rehane, Abbaspour, Morteza. (2015). presenting a model to determine the optimal rate of environmental taxes (with an emphasis on the effect of reallocation in Iran's electricity industry), Tax Research (Scientific Journal), 23(26): 18-39. .(In Persian).
Ho, J., Huang, Ch, J., Karuna, Ch. (2020). Large shareholder ownership types and board governance, Journal of Corporate Finance, 65(2): 113-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101715.
Hou, X., Liu, J., Zhang, D. (2018). Regional sustainable development: The relationship between natural capital utilization and economic development, Sustainable Development, 27(1): 183-195.
Hsu, Ch., Zhang, Y, Q., Ch, P., Aqdas, R., Chupradit, S., Nawaz, A. (2021). A step towards sustainable environment in China: The role of eco-innovation renewable energy and environmental taxes, Journal of Environmental Management, 299(1): 130-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113609.
Hutchens, M., Rego, S, O. (2015). Tax Risk and the Cost of Equity Capital. Working paper, Indiana University.
Ishaque, M. (2020). Cognitive approach to understand the impact of conflict of interests on accounting professionals’ decision-making behavior, Accounting Forum, 44(1): 64-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/01559982.2019.1583303.
Islamloian, Karim., Ostadzad, Alihossein. (2014). Green tax in the energy and final goods sectors in Iran: a game theory approach, Iran Energy Economics Research Journal, 5(17): 1-37.(In Persian).
Javaheri, Hadith, Amiri, Mojtabi, Seyed Javadin, Seyed Reza, Farhi, Ali, Amin, Fereshte. (2019). Presenting the ethical decision-making model of human resource managers; Case study: active organizations in the pharmaceutical industry, Organizational Behavior Studies, 9(3): 31-84. (In Persian).
Janova, J., Hampel, D., Nerudova, D. (2019). Design and validation of a tax sustainability index, European Journal of Operational Research, 278(3/1): 916-926 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.05.003.
Karydas, Ch., Zhang, L. (2018). Green tax reform, endogenous innovation and the growth dividend, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.09.005.
Kinander, M. (2018). Conflicts of interest in finance: Does regulating them reduce moral judgment, and is disclosure harmful? Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 26(3): 334-350. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-12-2016-0108.
Kopec, M. (2018). A pluralistic account of epistemic rationality, Synthese, 195(3): 3571-3596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1388-x.
Koska, O.A., Stähler, F. and Yeni, O. (2021). Trade and commodity taxes as environmental instruments in an open economy", Journal of Economic Studies, 48(2): 333-353. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2019-0362.
Lorenzi, P. (2017). A Different Carbon Tax: The Sustainable Green Tariff. Society, 54(2): 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0149-2.
Marconi, D. (2012). Trade, Technical Progress and the Environment: the Role of a Unilateral Green Tax on Consumption, Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 16(3): 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/16081625.2009.9720845.
Mehrani, Sasan., Thaghafi, Ali., Musakhani, Mohammad., Sepasi, Sahar. (2011). Effective factors on the ethical decision-making of certified public accountants of Iran, Ethics in Science and Technology, 6(3): 6-12.(In Persian).
Moller, N, F. (2019). Energy Demand, Substitution and Environmental Taxation: An Econometric Analysis of Eight Subsectors of the Danish Economy, Energy Economics journal, 61(2): 97-109.
Mousavi Azam, Seyed Mustafa. (1395). Semantics, ontology and the origin of analytical pluralism in wisdom, Ontological Research Journal, 9(1): 105-125. (In Persian).
Muresan, V. (2019). A Pluralist Ethical Decision-making Procedure, Journal of applied ethics and philosophy, 4(4): 11-21. https://doi.org/10.14943/jaep.4.11.
Niu, T., Yao, X., Shao, Sh., Li, D., Wang, W. (2018). Environmental tax shocks and carbon emissions: An estimated DSGE model, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 47(3): 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.06.005.
Oueslati, W. (2020). Growth and welfare effects of environmental tax reform and public spending policy, Economic Modelling. 2015. 45: 1-13.
Rodriguez, M., Robaina, M., Tentonio, C. (2019). Sectoral effects of a Green Tax Reform in Portugal, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104(2): 408-418.
Sadeghi, Syed Kamal., Beheshti, Mohammad Baqer., Ranjpour, Reza, Ebrahimi, Saeed. (1397). Empirical analysis of the effect of direct taxes on income distribution in Iran: the application of autoregression model of added factor, Research Journal of Taxation (Scientific Journal), 26(37): 41-72. (In Persian).
Seyednejadfahim, Seyyedreza, Esmaili. (1390). Green tax in the path of sustainable development, monthly review of economic issues and policies, 3/4(11): 91-100 . (In Persian).
  Sotoudehniakarani, Salman, Ahmadi Shadmehri, Mohammad Taher, Razmi, Seyed Mohammad Javad. (2019). Investigating the effect of green tax on the consumption of fossil energy (gasoline, natural gas and working oil) in Iran using the recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium (RDCGE) model, Macroeconomic Research, 15(29): 73-97.(In Persian).
Sotoudehniakarani, Salman, Ahmadi Shadmehri, Mohammad Taher, Razmi, Seyed Mohammad Javad. (2019). Investigating the effect of green tax on energy consumption and social welfare in Iran using the recursive dynamic computable general equilibrium (RDCGE) model, Economic Growth and Development Research Quarterly, 10(40): 15-34.(In Persian).
Turner, S., Dlima, D., Hudson, E., Morris, S., Sheringham, J., Swart, N., Fulop, N, J. (2017). Evidence use in decision-making on introducing innovations: a systematic scoping review with stakeholder feedback, Implementation Science, 12(2):145-177. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0669-6.
Waez, Seyyed Ali, Darash, Fereshte, Basirt, Mehdi, Kaab Umair, Ahmed. (2018). Assessing the tax stability and future tax risk of the company with an emphasis on the type of ownership, Research Journal of Taxation, 26(40): 185-204. (In Persian).
Xin, X., Wang, X., Tian, X., Zigenm Ch., Chen, K. (2019). Green scheduling model of shuttle tanker fleet considering carbon tax and variable speed factor, Journal of Cleaner Production, 234(10): 1134-1143.
Zhu, N., Bu, Y., Mbroh, N. (2020). Green financial behavior and green development strategy of Chinese power companies in the context of carbon tax, Journal of Cleaner Production, 245(1): 134-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118908.