Examining the Efficiency Models, Markowitz Mean–Semi Varianc, VaR and multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (NSGAII) under MSV and CVAR risk criterion in Selection Optimal Portfolio Shares Listed Firms on Stock Exchange
Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange

Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange

Examining the Efficiency Models, Markowitz Mean–Semi Varianc, VaR and multi-objective Genetic Algorithm (NSGAII) under MSV and CVAR risk criterion in Selection Optimal Portfolio Shares Listed Firms on Stock Exchange

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student, Department of Accounting, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Engineering, Technical-Engineering, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
5 Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematical, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran
Abstract
Choosing the optimal stock portfolio is an important issue in the economy. There are several techniques and tools to solve problem the optimal portfolio. In this research, using data of 15 stocks which randomly selected from the Tehran Stock Exchange including; PKOD, ZMYD, BPAS, FOLD, MKBT, GOLG, MSMI, PTAP, SSEP, AZAB, FKAS, NBEH, PFAN, GMRO and GSBE, the first return of these stocks are calculated daily in the period of 31/3/1394 -31/3/1399 for 5 years for 1183 days. Then and their portfolio risk is calculated using the models of mean–semi variance risk and conditional value at risk, and these two criteria are compared by the classical solution method. The portfolio optimization output with each of these risks represents a different weight per share. In the following, the mean–semi variance risk model and conditional value at risk model of metaheuristic method using MATLAB (R2019) software are compared. The results showed that the metaheuristic method of genetic algorithm compared to the classical method of mean–semi variance and conditional risk value of deviation in solving the problem of portfolio optimization had higher returns and lower risk under the risk criterion of mean–semi variance and therefore a better method for solve optimization problems.
Keywords

اکبری فرد، حسین؛ علائی، رضا؛ انارکی محمدی، احمد. (1396). بهینه‌سازی سبدسهام بورس اوراق بهادار با استفاده از الگوریتم‌‌های فراکاوشی. فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 10(38)،  87-110،
 doi: 10.22034/JSE.2017.11107
داودی، سید محمدرضا؛ صدری، ابوالفضل. (1397). مقایسه الگوریتم­های فرا ابتکاری در ارائه مدل بهینه سبد سهام چند دورهای بر اساس معیار ارزش در معرض ریسک، فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار،11(41)، 121-152، 2018،11125jse.10،22034.doi:
راعی، رضا؛ سعیدی، علی. (1392). مبانی مهندسی مالی و مدیریت ریسک، انتشارات سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتاب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها(سمت)، ایران، تهران.
شاه­حسینی، هادی­شهریار؛ موسوی میرکلائی، سیدمحمدرضا؛ ملاجعفری، مرتضی. (1391). الگوریتم­های تکاملی. انتشارات علم و صنعت، ایران، تهران.
کریمی، آرزو. (1400). بهینه‌سازی سبد سهام با استفاده از الگوریتم ژنتیک چند هدفه (NSGA II) و ماکزیمم نسبت شارپ. مهندسی مالی و مدیریت اوراق بهادار، 12(46), 389-410.
مریخ­ بیات، شاهرخ. (1393). الگوریتم­های بهینه­سازی الهام گرفته از طبیعت، ناشر موسسه علمی و فرهنگی (نص)، ایران، تهران.
 
References
Akbarifard, Hossein; Alaei, Reza; Mohammadi Anaraki, Ahmad. (2017). Optimal Portfolio Stock Exchange Using Meta-heuristic Algorithms, Quarterly Journal of the Stock Exchange. 87-110, 10 (38). doi: 10.22034/JSE.2017.11107. (In Persian).
Artzner, P; Delbaen, F; Eber, J. M; & Heath, D. (1999). Coherent Measures of Risk. Mathematical Finance, 9(3), pp. 203-228.
Campbell, R; Huisman, R; & Koedijk, K. (2001), Optimal Portfolio Selection in a Value-at-Risk Framework, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 25(9), pp. 1789-1804.
Chow, K; Denning, K. (1994). On Variance and lower partial Moment Betas: The Equivalence of Systematic Risk Measures, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 21.
Davoodi, Seyed Mohammad Reza; Sadri, Abolfazl. (2019), "Comparison of Meta-innovative algorithms in presenting the optimal model of multi-cycle stock portfolio based on Risk-Value Criteria", Quarterly Journal of the Stock Exchange, 11 (41), 152 -121. (In Persian).
Karimi, Arzo; (1400). Stock Portfolio Optimization Using Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (NSGA II) and Maximum Sharpe ratio. Financial Engineering and Securities Management. 12(46), 389-410. (In Persian).
Merrikh Bayat, Shahrukh; (2013). Optimization Algorithms Inspired by Nature, Publisher of Scientific and Cultural Institute (Nass), Iran, Tehran. (In Persian).
Markowitz, H. (1952), Portfolio Selection, Journal of Finance, Vol.7, no.1, pp. 77-99.
Metawa, Noura; and Hassan, M; Kabir and Elhoseny, Mohamed, (2017). Genetic Algorithm Based Model For Optimizing Bank Lending Decisions (March15, 2017). Expert Systems with Applications. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3263204.
Raei, R; Saeedi, A; (2013), Fundamentals of Financial Engineering and Risk Management, The Organization for Researching and Composing University Textbooks in the Islamic Sciences and the Humanities (SAMT). Tehran. Iran. (In Persian).
Rockafellar, R. T; and Uryasev, S. P. (2000) Optimization of Conditional Value-at-Risk. Journal of Risk (2), 21-42.
Shahhoseini, Mousavi & Mollajafari. (2011). Evolutionary algorithms. Alam and Sanat Publishing, Iran, Tehran. (In Persian).
Sushruta Mishra, Soumya Sahoo and Mamata Das, (2017), Genetic Algorithm: an Efficient Tool for Global, Advances in Computational Sciences and Technology, ISSN 0973-6107 Volume 10, Number 08, PP. 2211-2201.
Wei, S. Z. (2015). Multi-period Optimization Portfolio with Bankruptcy Control in Stochastic Market. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186 (15), 414-425.