Ahmadzadeh, A; Yavari, K; Isaee Tafreshi, M; Salehabadi, A. (2014). An Analysis on Methods of Market Efficiency Evaluation in Iran .
jemr, 5 (17), 1-28. (in Persian) (doi:
20.1001.1.22286454.1393.5.17.6.0)
Alkhamees, A. (2012). Private action as a remedy against market manipulation in the USA.
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance,
20(1), 41-55. (
https://doi.org/10.1108/13581981211199416)
Amini, M; IssaeiTafreshi, M. and Shahbazinia, M. (2015). Securities Market Manipulation, Concepts, Basics and Methods (A Comparative Study in Iranian and U.S. Law). Comparative Law Researches, 19(1), 1-26. (in Persian)
Azzutti, A; Ringe, W. G; & Stiehl, H. S. (2021). Machine learning, market manipulation, and collusion on capital markets: Why the" black box" matters. U. Pa. J. Int'l L; 43, 79-135. (https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/jil/vol43/iss1/2)
Banerjee, A; & Roy, P. (2023). High-frequency traders’ evolving role as market makers.
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,
82, 102184. (
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102184)
Booth, R. A. (2020). OOPs! The Inherent Ambiguity of Out-of-Pocket Damages in Securities Fraud Class Actions.
J. Corp. L; 46, 319-343. (
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3558216)
Booth, R. A. (2021). Deconstructing Scienter.
Va. L. & Bus. Rev; 16, 1. (
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3826619)
Bridegan, T; & Moussa, D. (2016). US v. Sarao: The flash crash and a new effort to prosecute market manipulation and deceptive trading practices. Geo. L. Tech. Rev; 1, 396-400.
(https://georgetownlawtechreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Bridegan-Moussa-1-GEO.-L.-TECH.-REV.-396.pdf)
Bromberg, A.R. and Lowenfels, L.D; (2010). Bromberg and Lowenfels on Securities Fraud and Commodities Fraud, Second edition, West Pub. Co.
Brown, N. D. (2011). The rise of high frequency trading: the role algorithms, and the lack of regulations, play in today's stock market. Appalachian JL, 11, 209. (https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/appalwj11&div=13&id=&page=)
Burch, E. C. (2006). Reassessing damages in securities fraud class actions. Md. L. Rev; 66, 348. (https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/753)
Chaffee, E. C. (2008). Standing under Section 10 (b) and Rule 10b-5: The Continued Validity of the Focused Seller Exception to the Purchaser-Seller Requirement. U. Pa. J. Bus. L; 11, 843. (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1397566)
De Villiers, M. (2021). Rule 10b-5 Meets Wagon Mound: A New Perspective on Loss Causation. Minn. JL Sci. & Tech; 23, 447.
(https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol23/iss2/2)
De Villiers, M. (2023). Loss Causation Decoded.
S. Cal. Interdisc. LJ,
33, 99. (
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4565413)
Donelson, D. C; & Prentice, R. A. (2012). Scienter pleading and rule 10b-5: Empirical analysis and behavioral implications. Case W. Res. L. Rev; 63, 441. (https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol63/iss2/8)
Dunbar, F. C; & Mayer, M. K. (2006). Dura and the New Vocabulary of Litigation Under Rule 10b-5. Working paper, NERA.
Erdlen, A. M. (2011). Timing is everything: Markets, loss, and proof of causation in fraud on the market actions. Fordham L. Rev; 80, 877. (https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol80/iss2/15)
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets.
Journal of finance,
25(2), 383-417. (
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x)
Ferrell, A. (2022). Hidden History of Securities Damages. The University of Chicago Business Law Review, 1(1), 4.
(https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ucblr/vol1/iss1/4)
Fletcher, G. G. S. (2020). Macroeconomic consequences of market manipulation. Law & Contemp. Probs; 83, 123.
(https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol83/iss1/8)
Fox, M. B. (2005). Demystifying causation in fraud-on-the-market actions. The Business Lawyer, 507-532.
(https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/4186)
Fox, M. B; Glosten, L. R; & Rauterberg, G. V. (2018). Stock market manipulation and its regulation. Yale J. on Reg; 35, 67.
(https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/4464)
Ghafari Farsani, B. (2019), Competition Law and Its Civil remedies, Tehran, Mizan Publishing. (in Persian)
Gillis, R. (2022). The Extraterritorial Reach of Section 10 (b): A Wolf Hunt off Wall Street. Emory LJ, 72, 437.
(https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol72/iss2/4)
Grundfest, J. A. (2013). Damages and Reliance under Section 10 (b) of the Exchange Act. Bus. Law; 69, 307.
(https://law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Damages-and-Reliance-under-Section-10b-of-the-Exchange-Act.pdf)
Hosseini Ameli, S. M. J; (1419 AH), Miftah al-Karama fi Sharh Qawiad al-‘alamah, Volume 14, Qom: Islamic Publications Office. (In Arabic)
Jourdain, P; (2006), Les principes de la responsabilité civile, Translator: Majid Adib, Tehran: Mizan Publications. (In Persian)
Jovanovic, F; Andreadakis, S; & Schinckus, C. (2016). Efficient market hypothesis and fraud on the market theory a new perspective for class actions.
Research in International Business and Finance,
38, 177-190. (
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.04.003)
Karki, Sh. (mohagheghe sani), (1408 AH), Jami al-Maqasid fi Sharh al-Qasas, Volume 4, Qom, Al-Bayt Institute. (in arabic)
Katouzian, N. (1400), General Rules of Contracts, Volume 5, Tehran, Ganj Danesh. (in Persian)
Katouzian, N. (2019), Non-contractual obligations; Civil liability, Volume 1, Tehran, Ganj Danesh Publications. (in Persian)
Kitson, M. A. (2012). Controversial Orthodoxy: The Efficient Capital Markets Hypothesis and Loss Causation. Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L; 18, 191. (https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/jcfl/vol18/iss1/7)
Korsmo, C. R. (2010). Mismatch: The Misuse of Market Efficiency in Market Manipulation Class Actions. Wm. & Mary L. Rev; 52, 1111.
(https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol52/iss4/3)
Korsmo, C. R. (2014). Market Efficiency and Fraud on the Market: The Danger of Halliburton. Lewis & Clark L. Rev; 18, 827.
(https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/faculty_publications/1685)
Langevoort, D. C. (2009). Basic at twenty: rethinking fraud on the market.
Wis. L. Rev; 151. (
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1026316)
Leder, M. (2023). Gaming The System: Why Courts Should Apply the Intent-Based Approach to Open-Market Manipulation Claims Under Rule 10b–5. (https://kb.osu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/58494dc7-8b81-4546-9f69-079d005ebf22/content)
Lee hazeN, T. (2020). The Law of Securities Regulation, 8th ed; West publishing Company.
Lightbourne, J. (2017). Algorithms & fiduciaries: existing and proposed regulatory approaches to artificially intelligent financial planners. Duke LJ, 67, 651. (https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol67/iss3/4)
Madigan, J. (2023). Reconsidering Scienter with Social Media: Adapting Rule 10b-5 in the Age of Elon Musk Tweets. Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L; 18, 787. (https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjcfcl/vol18/iss2/10)
Min-woo, K. (2022). Theories of Causal Nexus in Rule 10b-5 Claims: A Critical Reassessment.
Law and Business,
2(1), 5-19. (DOI:
10.2478/law-2022-0002)
Mobayen, H. (2016), Civil liability of Market Manipulation In the Stock Exchange,
Journal of Securities and Exchange, 9 (37), 107-134. (in Persian) (doi:
10.22034/jse.2016.11084)
Moos, D. (2004). Pleading Around the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act: Reevaluating the Pleading Requirements for Market Manipulation Claims. S. Cal. L. Rev; 78, 763. (https://southerncalifornialawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/78_763.pdf)
Najafi, Sh; (1983), Javaher al-Kalam fi Sharh Shar'e al-Islam, Volume 23, Beirut: Dar al-Hayya Tarath al-Arabi. (in arabic)
Nielsen, P; Prowse, S. (2008). SECURITIES LITIGATION; Dura’s Impact on Damages, The Corporate and Securities Law Advisor, 22.
(https://www.wsgr.com/PDFSearch/nielsen0708.pdf)
Pappavaselio, C. (2023). Back to Basics in Securities Fraud Class Actions: The Case for Rewinding the Basic Presumption. Berkeley Bus. LJ, 20, 316.
Park, J. J. (2010). Rule 10B-5 and the rise of the unjust enrichment principle. Duke LJ, 60, 345. (https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/dlj/vol60/iss2/2)
Paul, K. J. (2021). Playing the Game: Hedge Funds, Brokerage Firms, and Social Media Influencers in the Context of SEC Rule 10B-5 Market Manipulation. Ohio St. Bus. LJ, 16, 37.
(https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/eblwj16&div=6&id=&page=)
Piri, F. (2021). Law of exchange and securities. Tehran: Jangal publicatios. (in Persian)
Rapp, R. N. (2023). Plausible Cause: Exploring the Limits of Loss Causation In Pleading and Proving Market Fraud Claims Under Securities Exchange Act § 10 (b) and SEC Rule 10b-5. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 41(2), 4. (https://digitalcommons.onu.edu/onu_law_review/vol41/iss2/4)
Safaei, S. H; Rahimi, H. (2014), Civil Liability (Non-Contractual Obligations), Tehran: Samt Publications. (in Persian)
Scopino, G. (2015). Do automated trading systems dream of manipulating the price of futures contracts-policing markets for improper trading practices by algorithmic robots. Fla. L. Rev; 67, 221.
(https://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/flr/vol67/iss1/5)
Sergakis, K. (2018). The law of capital markets in the EU: disclosure and enforcement. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Shabani,
M. S. (2024), The Basics of Civil Liability of Insider Trading in Capital Market,
Journal of Securities and Exchange, 67, 1-24. (in Persian)
Shamsollahi, M. (2019), law of securities, Tehran: Mizan Publications. (in Persian)
Shamsollahi, M. (2021). Establishing Causation in civil liability lawsuits derived from violation of the securities market disclosure requirements (with a comparative study of US and French law). Encyclopedia of Economic Law Journal, 27(18), 165-202. (in Persian) (doi: 10.22067/lowecon.2021.48042.0)
Silverman, M. (2010). Fraud created the market: presuming reliance in Rule 10b-5 primary securities market fraud litigation. Fordham L. Rev; 79, 1787. (https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol79/iss4/10)
Söderström, R. (2011). Regulating Market Manipulation: An Approach to designing Regulatory Principles. Juridiska fakulteten, Uppsala universitet.
Steckman, L. A; Conner, R. E; & Taylor, K. S. (2014). Loss Causation, Economic Loss Rules and Offset Defenses-Dismissal Motion Practice after Acticon AG v. China North East Petroleum Holdings Ltd. Touro L. Rev; 31, 501. (https://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/lawreview/vol31/iss3/14)
Steinberg, M. I; (2018). Understanding securities law, 7th ed; Carolina Academic Press
Thompson, R. B. (1984). Measure of Recovery under Rule 10b-5: A Restitution Alternative to Tort Damages, The. Vand. L. Rev; 37, 349.
(https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol37/iss2/4)
Wang, W. K. (2009). Measuring Insider Trading Damages for a Private Plaintiff. UC Davis Bus. LJ, 10.
(https://blj.ucdavis.edu/archives/10/1/measuring-insider-trading-damages-private-plaintiff)
Willey, D. P. (2015). Misplaced Reliance: Rethinking Rule 10B-5 and the Casual Connection. BUL Rev; 95, 651.
(https://www.bu.edu/bulawreview/files/2015/03/WILLEY.pdf)
Yadav, Y. (2016). The failure of liability in modern markets. Va. L. Rev; 102, 1031.
(https://www.virginialawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Yadav_Online.pdf).
