Optimal standard of resolution legal disputes in the capital market
Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange

Quarterly Journal of Securities Exchange

Optimal standard of resolution legal disputes in the capital market

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Private and Economic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
2 M.Sc. Student, Department of Private and Economic Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
The goal of capital market dispute resolution system is legal claims resolution with a focus on securing private interests, like civil litigation. The difference is that there are public and economic interests of the country in addition to private interests in the capital market.
Ensuring a fair and efficient dispute resolution system is one of the factors for capital market prosperity by reducing investment risk and encouraging more investment. The efficiency of dispute resolution system is rooted in its desirability for investors. Fairness, speed, and expertise in dispute resolution system are the most important criteria for the desirability of dispute resolution system from the perspective of investors.
Alignment with the special interests and necessities of capital market dispute resolution system (speed and expertise) will be achieved by deviating from some principles of dispute resolution system, while the invariable and definite principles of dispute resolution must be completely applied. The present research seeks to identify and evaluate the mentioned principles by the descriptive-analytical method.
Keywords

استوار سنگری، کوروش، (1399)، «چیستی دادرسی اداری در ایران؛ دادرسی در اداره یا دادرسی بر اداره»، فصلنامه علمی پژوهش­های نوین حقوق اداری، 2 (4): 159-135، 10.22034/mral.2020.139000.1069.
انصاری، علی؛ عیسائی تفرشی، محمد؛ حسینی، سید میلاد، (1392) «تحلیل ساختار حقوقی نهادهای خودانتظام در بازار سرمایه ایران با مطالعه تطبیقی در نظام حقوقی آمریکا»، نشریه تحقیقات مالی، 15 (2): 160-149،  10.22059/JFR.2013.51074.
بطحایی، سیدفرهاد؛ شمس، عبدالله، (1395)، «معیار تشخیص استقلال و بی­طرفی داور»، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی،  20 (77): 65-39.
درگاه ملی قوه قضاییه، (1399)، «سند تحول قضایی»، بخش قوانین و مقررات/ بخشنامه­های رییس قوه قضاییه،  تاریخ بازدید: 11/3/1400، (قابل دسترس در rrk.ir/Files/Laws).
دیلمی، احمد؛ فریدون، محدثه، (1399)، «بررسی تطبیقی قلمرو افشاء اطلاعات در عرضه اولیه اوراق بهادار در حقوق ایران و آمریکا»، فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 13 (50): 80-54، 10.22034/JSE.2020.11179.
شاملو، باقر؛ محمدی، شهرام، (1390)، «نقض بی­طرفی و عدم استقلال قاضی؛ جلوهای از اقدام مخل دادرسی عادلانه»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، 14 (6).
شکری، محمد؛ ایرانشاهی، علیرضا؛ تقی­زاده، ابراهیم، (1398)، «امکان­سنجی اعتراض به آرای هیأت داوری بورس؛ دیوان عدالت اداری یا محاکم دادگستری»، فصلنامه حقوق اداری، 7 (20): 200-177، 10.29252/qjal.7.20.177 .
قاسمی حامد، عباس؛ براری چناری، یوسف؛ جهانیان، مجتبی، (1400)، «بررسی داوری اجباری اختلافات حوزه بازار اوراق بهادار با نگاهی به آراء هیأت داوری (تحلیل ماده 36 قانون بازار اوراق بهادار جمهوری اسلامی ایران مصوب 1384) و پیشنویس قانون ارتقای نظام بازار سرمایه کشور»، فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار، 4 (54)، 109-142،  10.22034/JSE.2020.11202.1420.
کاتوزیان، ناصر، (1379)، مجموعه مقالات گامی به سوی عدالت، جلد دوم، چاپ دوم، تهران، نشر میزان.
کریمی، عباس؛ پرتو، حمیدرضا، (1391)، «داوری­پذیری دعاوی مربوط به اموال عمومی و دولتی»، فصلنامه پژوهش حقوق عمومی، 14 (36): 184-157.
محبی، محسن، (1378)، «نظام داوری اتاق بازرگانی بین­المللی»، مجله حقوقی بین­المللی، 17 (24): 119-31،  10.22066/CILAMAG.2000.18139.
میرزایی منفرد، غلامعلی، (1395)، حقوق بازار اوراق بهادار (حل­وفصل اختلافات)، چاپ دوم، تهران، نشر میزان.
نورانی مقدم، سید یونس؛ عیوضی، اعظم، (1395)، «انواع دعاوی و شیوه­ی رسیدگی در بازار سرمایه ایران و آمریکا»، مطالعات حقوق تطبیقی،  7 (1): 365-345،  10.22059/JCL.2016.58615.
 
References
Ansari, Ali; Isayi Tafreshi, Mohammad; Hosseini, Seyed Milad, (2013) "Analysis of Legal Framework of Self-Regulatory Organizations in Iran’ Capital Market with Comparative Study in the US Legal System", Financial Research Journal, 15 (2): 160-149, 10.22059 / JFR.2013.51074. (In Persian).
Bathaei, Seyed Farhad; Shams, Abdollah, (2016), "Criteria for recognizing the independence and impartiality of the arbitrator", Legal Research Quarterly, 20 (77): 65-39. (In Persian).
Bondi, Bradley J. (2010), "Exploring Arbitration as an Alternative to Litigation", Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 33.
Cana, Peter, (2009), Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Carroll, Kevin, (2021), "Securities Arbitration System Works Effectively and Benefits Investors", Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (SIMFA), available at: sifma.org/resources/news/securities-arbitration-system-works-effectively-and-benefits-investors, Visited in May 2022.
Deylami, Ahmad; Freydoun, Fohadeseh, (2020), "Comparative analysis of the scope of disclosure information in the initial release of Iranian & US law", Journal of Securities Exchange, 13 (50): 80-54, 10.22034/JSE.2020.11179. (In Persian).
Expert Institute Expert, (2020), "Reasoned Awards in FINRA Arbitration", The Expert Institute, available at: expertinstitute/resources/insights/reasoned-awards-in-finra-arbitration, Visited in January 2022.
 Finra, (2021), "FINRA Dispute Resolution Services", available at: finra.org/For Investors/Dispute Resolution, Visited in January 2022.
Ghasemi hamed, Abbas; Berari chenari, Yousef; Jahanian, Mojtaba, (2021), "Enforced Arbitration Review of Securities Market Disputes with a Look at Arbitration Boards (Analysis of Article 36 of the Islamic Republic of Iran Securities Market Act, 2005) And a draft law on promoting the country's capital market system", Journal of Securities Exchange, 4 (54), 109-142, 10.22034/JSE.2020.11202.1420. (In Persian).
Gu Weixia, (2013), "Securities Arbitration in China: A Better Alternative To Retail Shareholder Protection", Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, Volume 33:283.
International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), (2003), "Objectives and Principles of Securities Regulation International".
Karimi, Abbas; Parto, Hamidreza, (2011), "Null variability prayers related to property and general public", Public Law Research, 14 (36): 184-157. (In Persian).
Katozian, Nasser, (2000), Collection of Articles a Step towards Justice, Volume 2, Second Edition, Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian).
Mirzaei Monfared, Gholamali, (2017), Law of Securities Market (Dispute Resolution), Second Edition, Tehran, Mizan Legal Foundation. (In Persian).
Mohebi, Mohsen, (2000), "The Arbitration System of International Chamber of Commerce", International Law Review, 17 (24): 119-31, 10.22066 / CILAMAG.2000.18139. (In Persian).
Nourani Moghaddam, Seyed Younes; Aivazi, Azam, (2016), "Types of claims and procedures in Iran and USA's capital market", Comparative Law Review, 7 (1): 365-345, 10.22059 / JCL.2016.58615. (In Persian).
Ostvar Sangari, Kourosh, (2020), "Essence of administrative proceedings in Iran: proceedings in the administration or proceedings on the administration", Journal of Modern Research on Administrative Law, 2 (4): 159-135, 10.22034 / mral.2020.139000.1069. (In Persian).
Priest, Margot, (1998), "The privatization of regulation, five models of self-regulation", Ottawa Law Review, 29 (2).
Ruder, David S. (1998), "Elements of a fair and efficient securities arbitration system", Arizona Law Review, Vol. 40:1101.
Shamlu, Baqher; Mohammadi, Shahram, (2011), "Violation of impartiality and lack of independence of the judge; The Prevention of Impairment in a Fair Trial», Legal Research Quarterly, 14 (6). (In Persian).
Shokri, Mohammad, Iranshahi, Alireza; Taghizadeh, Ebrahim, (2019), "Feasibility study of protesting against the votes of the stock exchange arbitration panel; Court of Administrative Justice or Courts of Justice ", Journal of Administrative Law, 7 (20): 200-177, 10.29252 / qjal.7.20.177. (In Persian).
SRO Consultative Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), (2000), " Model for Effective Regulation".