نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
The pre-emptive right due to the increase of capital is a transferable financial entitlement that expires after a certain period of time and recognized as an unused pre-emptive. Iranian and American Legislators and lawyers are silent about the nature of the unused pre-emptive rights, but with the comparative study of this rights in two countries,in American law, unused right is independent of the shareholders pre-emptive rights, so that with the abolition of the shareholders' preemptive right, capital raising as the source of this right remains intact And this is the root of the unexercised right which belongs to the company as a whole not to the shareholders, while in Iran with the expiry of a certain period of time pre-emptive rights due to its customary value continues to its existence as an unexercised pre-emptive rights, so that shareholders capacity to exercise pre-emptive rights subjected to certain time and with expires of that time and capacity to have the rights remains intact and capacity to exercise the rights transfer to the company on the behalf of shareholders.
کلیدواژهها English
18. Arega, Lemlem Fekadu, 2015,Preemptive Rights and Anti-dilution Rules,Budapest, Central European University
19. ABA, 2008,model business corporation act annotated, Chicago,American bar foundation
20. Arkansas Code,2010
21. Cahn, Andreas & Donald, David C, 2010, Comparative Company Law, London, Cambridge University press
22. Code of American federal regulations,2007
23. Delaware General Corporation Act, 2017
24. Djankov, Simeon, La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, Shleifer, Andrei, 2008,” The Law and Economics of Self-Dealing”,Journal of Financial Economics,vol 88 Washington
25. Grant, Geremy,2005, A Survey of Preemption Rights in Theory And Practice, Russia,EU/TACIS Russia Corporate Governance Facility,
27. Holderness, Clifford & Pontiff, Jeffrey, 2015Shareholder nonparticipation in valuable rights offerings: New findings for an old puzzle, Boston,Boston College
29. https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/93026/handley-v
30. Kerbib, Hugo, 2017,comparative corporate law:the US corporation and the French SA, Paris,Dauphine university
31. Kentucky Revised Statutes,2014
32. Louisiana Revised Statutes,2014
33. M.Murray,Jerry, 2018,”elimination of preemptive rights in Wyoming corporation”, Wyoming law journal,vol 13,Wyoming
34. Manning, Byless & Hanks.Jr, James,1990,”Legal Capital”, Foundation Press, vol 5,Washington, D.C,
35. Massa, Massimo, Vermaelen, Theo, Xu, Moqi, 2013.Rights offerings, trading, and regulation A global perspective, London,London School of Economics & Political Science
36. Model Business Corporation Act, 2005
37. New York Business Corporation Act, 2006
38. New York Stock Exchange rules 2006
39. New Mexico Statutes,2013
40. Nasdaq listing rules 2017
41. New Mexico Statutes,2013
42. Ohio Revised Cod,2011
44. R. Macey, Jonathan, 1993”Corporate Law and Corporate Governance: A Contractual Perspective”, Yale Law School journal, Yale
45. Ventoruzzo, Marco, 2013”Issuing New Shares and Preemptive Rights: A Comparative Analysis”,Richmond Journal of Gloable Law & Business,Vol 12,Richmond
46. Woronoff, Michael A,Rosen, Jonathan A, 2005”Understanding Anti-Dilution Provisions in Convertible Securities”,Fordham Law Review, Vol 74,New York
