مدیریت سرمایه گذاری استوار با عدم قطعیت در وزن دهی دارایی ها توسط مدیران صندوق های سرمایه گذاری

مدیریت سرمایه گذاری استوار با عدم قطعیت در وزن دهی دارایی ها توسط مدیران صندوق های سرمایه گذاری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مهندسی مالی دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه مدیریت دانشکده مدیریت، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی - واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

چکیده

در این مقاله چارچوب استواری بیان شده است که در آن عدم اطمینان برخواسته از تخصیص وجوه صندوقهای سرمایه گذاری به داراییها به همراه عدم اطمینان ناشی از بازده داراییها، مدنظر قرار گرفته است. هدف این است که سرمایه گذاران بتوانند با سنجش دقیقتر مهارت مدیران صندوقها، وجوه خود را به طور کارآمدتری بین صندوقها تسهیم کنند. در این مدل و در بین دوره های زمانی هر صندوق، بدترین واریانس (ریسک) و از بین بدترین ها،کوچکترین واریانس انتخاب گردیده است. به همین دلیل برای حل مسئله از Min-Max استفاده شده است.
جداول به دست آمده از این مدل مشخص می کند که سرمایه گذاران باید چه مبلغ یا درصدی از سرمایه خود را در کدام یک از صندوقها، سرمایه گذاری نمایند؛ که در این صورت پرتفوی آنها از جنبه ریسک و بازده (ریسک و انتخاب اوراق بهادار) و همچنین از جنبه ریسک و وزن دهی به داراییها، بهینه می شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Robust investment management with uncertainty in asset weighting by fund managers investment funds

نویسندگان [English]

  • REZA faghire 1
  • gholamreza zomorodian 2
  • Majid Shariat panahi 3
  • Mir Feyz Fallahshams 4
1 PhD student in Financial Engineering, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Management, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Management, Faculty of Management, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran
4 Islamic Azad University Tehran Branch/ Finance associate professor
چکیده [English]

In this article, the issue is that the investment manager should allocate his available funds to a set of fund managers whose assets are assigned to the fund manager. Investing (or money manager) is not exactly known. The paper addresses the sustainability framework in which the uncertainty about the allocation of funds from asset managers to asset managers, combined with the uncertainty arising from the return on the asset group, has been taken into account so that investors can more accurately measure the skills of fund managers, funds Separate yourself more efficiently between funds. In the proposed model, the variance is considered as a risk, and among the periods of each fund, the worst variance and the worst, the smallest variance is chosen. For this reason, Min-Max has been used to solve the problem.
As we see, the results obtained from a firm modeling solution, the number of excess returns (nominal and benchmark differences) as well as the number of risk changes relative to the standard returns in the outcome tables determine that investors must pay their funds in which of the fund And how much they invest.
In the five-step process of investment management or securities portfolio formation, the two components of securities selection and weighting are decided. In this process, the last step is to measure the performance of the portfolio in which the rate of return is measured along with the risk.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Uncertainty
  • Risk
  • return
  1. Marhfor,Portfolio Performance Measurement Review of Literature and Avenues of Future Research, 20,April 2016 ,American Journal of Industrial and Business Management,2016,6,432-438
  2. Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(7):1505–1518, 2002.
  3. Agarwal, W. Fung, Y. C. Loon, and N.Y. Naik. Risks in hedge fund strategies: The case of convertible arbitrage. Working Paper, Georgia State University and London Business School,
  4. Alexander, T.F. Coleman, and Y. Li. Minimizing cvar and var for a portfolio of derivatives. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30(2):583–605, 2006.
  5. Arnott, J. Jsu, and P. Moore. Fundamental indexation. Finanical Analysts Journal, 61: 83–99, 2005.
  6. Artzner, F. Delbean, J.M. Eber, and D. Heath. Coherent measure of risks. Mathematical Finance, 9(3):203–228, 1999 July.
  7. Leerink and G.V.Breukelen, Multi-Performance Attribution,Ortec-Finance, 2015
  8. Practical portfolio performance measurement and attribution. Wiley Finance, 2004.
  9. Ben-Tal and A.S. Nemirovski. Robust convex optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research, 23(4):769–805, 1998. 97
  10. Bertsimas, D.B. Brown, and C. Caramanis. Theory and applications of robust optimization. SIAM Review, 53:464–501, 2011a.
  11. Blake, A.Rossi, A.Timmermann, I.Tonks, and R. Wermers, Decentralized,5,2008
  12. Brinson and N. Fachler. Measuring non-us equity portfolio performance. Journal of Portfolio Management, pages 73–76, 1985.
  13. On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52:57–82, 1997.
  14. Arithmetic and geometric attribution. Journal of Performance Mea- surement, Fall: 59–68, 1999.
  15. Cetinkaya and A. Thiele. Data-driven portfolio management with quantile constriants. Working Paper, Lehigh University, 2012.
  16. Chen and S. Burer. Globally solving nonconvex quadratic programming problems via completely positive programming. Manthmatical Programming Computations, 4:33–52, 2012.
  17. Gallagher, G. Harman, C. Schmidt, G. Warren, Global Equity Fund Performance: An Attribution Approach, Financial Analysts Journal/Publication of CFA Institute: First Quarter 2017
  18. Davies and D Laker. Multiple-period performance attribution using the brin- son model. Journal of Performance Measurement, Fall:12–22, 2001.
  19. Dong and A.C. Thiele. Robust portfolio management with uncertainty in asset allocation. Working paper, 2014.
  20. F. Fama and K. R. French. Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 1:3–56, 2000.
  21. Girard, A.Pondillo and R.Prodor, Conducting Performance a Hribution Analysis in Classroom Using Meal Market Data, Journal of Financial Education, Vol .31 ,(Fall) 2005, P.P 57-76
  22. ElGhaoui, M. Oks, and F Oustry.Worst-case value-at-risk and robust portfolio optimization: a conic programming approach. Operations Research, 51(4):543–556, 2003.
  23. Black, and R. Litterman. "Global portfolio optimization". Financial Analysts Journal, 48 (5), p. 16. 1992
  24. Petronio , T.Lando , A.Biglova , S.Ortobelli, Optimal Portfolio Performance in Exchange-Traded Funds , Economickarevue-Central European Review of Economic Issues,17,2014
  25. Fung and D. A. Hsieh. Asset-based style factors for hedge funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 58(5):16–27, 2002a.
  26. Brinson, R. Hood, and G. Beebower. Determinants of portfolio performance. Financial Analyst Journal, pages 39–44, 1986.
  27. B.Brinson, B.D.Singer and G.L.Beebower, Determinants of Portfolio Performance II: An Update, Financial Analysis Journal, Vol .47, No .3 (May-Jun 1991), P.P 40-48
  28. P.Brinson , L.R.Hood , G.L.Beebower , Determinats of Portfolio Oerformance , Financial Analysts Journal,July-August,1986,PP.39-44
  29. Gaivoronski and G. C. Pflug. Value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: properties and computational approach. Journal of Risk, 7(2):1–31, 2005.
  30. Glasserman and X. Xu. Robust portfolio control with stochastic factor dynamics. Revised and resubmitted to Operations Research, 2012.
  31. Waelbroeck, C. Gomes, The Role of Trading in Portfolio Performance Attribution, Journal of Performance Measurement, zz, no 1: 52-76, Apr 2018
  32. Treynor. How to rate management of investment funds. Harvard Business Review, 43: 63–75, 1965.
  33. Treynor. Why market-valuation-indifferent indexing works. Finanical Analysts Journal, 61: 65–69, 2005.
  34. C.HSU.V.Kalesink and B.W.Myers, Performance a Hribution: Measuring Dynamic Allocation Skill, Financial Analysts Journal, Volume 66, No 6 © 2010 CFA Institue
  35. R.Hood, Determinants of Portfolio Performance-20 years Later, Financial Analysts Journal
  36. Jensen. The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945-1964. Journal of Finance, 23:389–416, 1968.
  37. Lestel, Performance Attribution from Bacon: June 2019
  38. Hassinc , T.Roncalli , Measuring Performance Of Exchange Traded Funds, Feb.2013
  39. Cogneay , G.Hubner , The 101 Ways to Measure Portfolio Performance , SSRN Electronic Journal January 2009, Dol:10.2139/ssrn,1326076
  40. Pang and S. Leyffer. On the global minimization of the value-at-risk. Optimization Methods and Software, 19(5):611–631, 2014.
  41. Campbell, R. Huisman, and K. Koedijk. Optimal portfolio selection in a value-at-risk framework. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25(9):1789–1804, 2001.
  42. Basak and A. Shapiro. Value-at-risk managemant: Optimal policies and asset prices. Valueat- risk managemant: Optimal policies and asset prices, 14(2):371–405, 2001.
  43. Benati and R. Rizzi. A mixed integer linear programming formulation of the optimal mean/value-at-risk portfolio problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(1): 423–434, 2007.
  44. Ceria, F. Margot, A. Renshaw, and A. Saxena. Novel approaches to portfolio construction: multiple risk models and multisolution generation. Optimizing Optimization: The Next Generation of Optimization Applications and Theory, Elsevier Science:23–45, 2009.
  45. Treynor and K. Mazuy. Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review, 44:131–163, 1966.
  46. Gabrel, C. Murat, and A. Thiele. Recent advances in robust optimization an robustness. Technical report, Universite Paris-Dauphine, 2012.