بررسی شیوه‌های ارتباط صنعت و دانشگاه و ارائه الگوی مطلوب ارتباط سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار با دانشگاه‌های کشور
فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار

فصلنامه بورس اوراق بهادار

بررسی شیوه‌های ارتباط صنعت و دانشگاه و ارائه الگوی مطلوب ارتباط سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار با دانشگاه‌های کشور

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه آموزشی حسابداری دانشکده علوم مالی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
2 دانشگاه تهران، دانشکده مدیریت، پردیس فارابی، قم، ایران
3 دانشگاه تهران، دانشکدگان مدیریت، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با توجه به نقش کلیدی تعامل صنعت و دانشگاه در شکل‌گیری و پیشبرد نوآوری، هدف پژوهش حاضر شناسایی و رتبه‎ بندی سازوکارهای تعاملاتی سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار با دانشگاه‌های کشور براساس مجموعه‌ای از معیارهای منتخب است. در این راستا، به‌منظور شناسایی معیارهای سنجش اثربخشی تعاملات و همچنین شناسایی سازوکارهای تعاملی مؤثر، از روش گروه کانونی خبرگان و نظرسنجی از خبرگان استفاده شده ‎است. به‌منظور تعیین وزن و اهمیت معیارهای ارزیابی مورد نیاز برای اولویت‌بندی سازوکارهای تعاملی، از فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی (AHP) چندمعیاره استفاده شده ‎است. نتایج تحلیل داده‌ها نشان می‌دهد، معیارهای «یادگیری» با ضریب 0/39 و «پاسخگویی به نیازها» با ضریب 0/30 یشترین اهمیت را در ارزیابی سازوکارهای تعامل صنعت و دانشگاه دارند. براین اساس، پنج سازوکار «حضور/برگزاری کنفرانس و رویدادهای مشترک»، «حمایت از طرح‌ها و پروژه‌های پژوهشی (پایان نامه، رساله و ...)»، «طراحی فرصت‌های مطالعاتی مشترک»، «برگزاری دوره‌های کارآموزی مشترک»، و «انعقاد قراردادهای پژوهشی با دانشگاه‌ها» به‌عنوان مهم‌ترین و مؤثرترین سازوکارهای تعامل سازمان بورس و اوراق بهادار با دانشگاه‌ها شناسایی می‌شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Developing an Optimal Model for University–Industry Collaboration: The Case of the Securities and Exchange Organization of Iran

نویسندگان English

Hasan Farajzadeh Dehkordi 1
Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Mousavi 2
Mohammad Reza Sadeghi 3
1 Faculty of Financial Sciences Kharazmi University Tehran Iran
2 Department of Management, Farabi Campus, Tehran University, Qom. Iran
3 Department of Management, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Given the pivotal role of university–industry collaboration in fostering and advancing innovation, the present study aims to identify and rank the interaction mechanisms between the Securities and Exchange Organization (SEO) and universities in Iran based on a set of selected criteria. To identify the criteria for assessing the effectiveness of such interactions and to determine the most influential mechanisms, expert focus groups and expert surveys were employed. Furthermore, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was used to determine the weights and relative importance of the evaluation criteria required for prioritizing the interaction mechanisms. The findings indicate that the criteria of learning (weight = 0.39) and responsiveness to needs (weight = 0.30) hold the greatest importance in evaluating university–industry interaction mechanisms. Accordingly, five mechanisms—participation in or organization of joint conferences and events, support for research projects (including theses and dissertations), designing joint study opportunities, conducting joint internship programs, and establishing research contracts with universities—are identified as the most significant and effective mechanisms through which the SEO can engage with universities.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

innovation
decision criteria
university and industry interaction
Ahmed, F; Fattani, M.T; Ali, S. R; & Enam, R. N. (2022). Strengthening the Bridge between Academic and the Industry through the Academia-Industry Collaboration Plan Design Model. Frontiers in psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.875940.
Alunurm R, Roigas K, Varblane U (2020) The relative significance of higher education-industry cooperation barriers for different firms. Ind High Educ, 34(6), 377–390. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 0950422220 909737.
Ankrah S. & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015), Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31(3): 387-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003.
Awasthy, R; Flint, S; Sankarnarayana, R. & Jones, R.L. (2020), "A framework to improve university–industry collaboration", Journal of Industry-University Collaboration, 2(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIUC-09-2019-0016
Bjerregaard, T. (2009), Universities‐industry collaboration strategies: a micro‐level perspective, European Journal of Innovation Management, 12(2), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060910953951
Bozeman B, & Gaughan M (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers’ interactions with industry. Research policy, 36(5), 694-707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007
Bürger, R. & Fiates, GGS. (2024), Fundamental elements of university-industry interaction from a grounded theory approach, Innovation & Management Review, 21(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-08-2021-0156
Chen, X; Yang, J.A; & Park, H.W. (2012). Chinese patterns of university-industry collaboration. Asian Journal of Innovation and Policy, 1(1), 116-132. https://doi.org/10.7545/ajip.2012.1.1.116
De Fuentes, C. & Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long-term benefit, Research Policy, 41(9), 1666-1682, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.026.
D’Este, P. & Patel, P. (2007). University–industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? Research policy, 36(9), 1295-1313, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002.
Etzkowitz, H; & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24(1): 2–5 https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/24.1.2.
Farahi, M.M. & Beigi Nasrabadi, F. (2023). University and industry: From contracting relations to strategic partnerships; providing strategic role model in university-society relations. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 26(1), 97-122. (In Persian). https://journal.irphe.ac.ir/article_702995.html?lang=en
Freitas, I.M.B; Geuna, A; & Rossi, F. (2013). Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university–industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(1), 50-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007.
Ghareche, M; parishani, A; eivazinezhad, S. & mirzaei, N. (2020). The exploratory pattern of promoting the university-industry relationship. Journal of Strategic Management Studies, 11(43), 1-20. (In Persian). https://www.smsjournal.ir/article_109849.html
Guimon, J. (2013). Promoting university-industry collaboration in developing countries (Innovation Policy Platform, OECD and World Bank). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5176.8488
Kravchenko, P; Burtsev, D; Gavrilyuk, E; Izotova, A; & Litvinova, N. (2024). RETRACTED: Interaction between universities and forestry enterprises for the development university ecosystems in Russia. BIO Web of Conferences. 116, https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/11607026
Lind, F; Styhre, A; & Aaboen, L. (2013). Exploring university-industry collaboration in research centres. Eur J Innov Manag 16(1):70–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601-06131-12928 69
Martinelli, A; Meyer, M; & Von Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 259-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9031-5.
Meyer, M. (2003). Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? Research–based ventures and public support mechanisms. R&D Management, 33(2), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00286.
Mulaee A. & Alimohammadiayn, A. (2024). Challenges Relationship between Government and Securities & Exchange Organization; Emphasizing High Exchange Council, Journal of Securities Exchange, 16(63), 1-30. (In Persian). https://doi.org/ 10.22034/jse.2023.11472.1620.
Nikounejad, S; Ghaderi, M; Azizi, N; Thång, P; & Neyestani, M. R. (2021). University-Industry Relationships in Iran and Sweden: A Critical Comparative Study. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 4(4), 1520-1549. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijce.2020.251473.1225
OKAY, Ş. 2009. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Öğretim Elemanlarının Üniversite-Sanayi İşbirliği Çalışmalarına Bakışları Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması. Journal of Technical-Online Teknik Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu. 8)2(, 94-111. https://sujes.selcuk.edu.tr/sujes/article/download/94/549.
Oshriyeh, Z; Asghari, H; & Shafia, S. (2019). Meta-analysis of university-industry links. Journal of Industry and University, 31, 65-82. (In Persian). http://jiu.ir/fa/Article/167
Perkmann, M; & Walsh, K. (2008). Engaging the scholar: Three types of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry. Research Policy, 37(10), 1884-1891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
Perkmann, M; Tartari, V; McKelvey, M; Autio, E; Broström, A; D’Este, P; ... & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007.
Ramos-Vielba, I; Fernández-Esquinas, M; & Espinosa-de-los-Monteros, E. (2010). Measuring university–industry collaboration in a regional innovation system. Scientometrics, 84(3), 649-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0113-z.
Razak, A.A & White, G.R.T. (2015). The triple helix model for innovation: a holistic exploration of barriersand enablers. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model, 7(3):278–291. https://doi.org/10.504/IJBPSCM.2015. 071600.
Rossoni, A.L; de Vasconcellos, E.P.G. & de Castilho Rossoni, R.L. (2023). Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: a systematic. review. Management Review Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1.
Sadeghi, M.R; Moghimi, M.S; & Ramezan, R. (2013). Identifying and prioritizing effective constructs in readiness of knowledge management implementation by using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Journal of Knowledge-based Innovation in China, 5(1), 16-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561411311320941.
Salleh, M.S; & Omar, M.Z; (2013) University-industry Collaboration Models in Malaysia, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102, 654-664, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.784.
Saunders, M.N; Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students, New York: Pearson Education Limited, 8th EDITION.
Shahabi, A; & Feiz, D. (2019). Modeling the roale of coordination centers of science and industry in the development of university-industry relations using a system dynamics approach. Journal of Industry and University, 17, 39-50. (In Persian). https://jour.aicti.ir/Article/23/FullText
Sheikhi, K; Matinfard, M; Saeedi, A; & Hassani, M. (2023). Designing a model to evaluate the quality of financial statements in the Iranian banking industry, Journal of Securities Exchange, 16(61), 113-158. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22034/jse.2022.11800.1866
Siegel, D.S; Waldman, D.A; Atwater, L.E; & Link, A.N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university–industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5.
Tseng, F.C; Huang, M.H; & Chen, D.Z. (2020), Factors of university–industry collaboration affecting university innovation performance. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9656-6
Villani, E; Rasmussen, E; & Grimaldi, R. (2017). How intermediary organizations facilitate university–industry technology transfer: A proximity approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 86-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.004.
Zakery, A; Shamsollahi, M.S; Ghafarimoghadam, A; & Pishvaee, M.S. (2019). A Decision-making Pattern for University-industry Collaboration Considering the Diversity in Mechanisms and External Players. Journal of Science and Technology Policy, 12(1), 33-50. (In Persian). https://doi: 10.22034/jstp.2019.11.1.2021